NEWS
  • CDC Investigates Illness Outbreak on Royal Caribbean's Radiance of the Seas || BVI Governor Attends Men's Health Fair as Community Pushes for Wellness || St. George’s Secondary and VISTS Advance in Inter-Secondary School Debates || BVI Citizens Do Not Require Visas for Travel to Guyana || MPs Criticise British Virgin Islands Over New Corporate Ownership Register. ||. BVI Welcomes Six American Airlines Flights in One Day, Boosting Tourism || CIBC Caribbean Helps Restock Family Support Network Pantry in BVI || Tortola Auto Group Rolls Out "Deals 2 Love" Sales Event for Valentine’s Day || Three Women Set Their Sights on Miss RVIPF 2025 Title || BVI Government Launches “Business Done RIGHT” Campaign to Strengthen Financial Integrity || BVI to Honour Late Educator Ruby Smith-Newberry with Literary and Cultural Celebration || PAW BVI Nears Milestone of 5,000 Spay/Neuter Surgeries || ADVERTISEMENT: Need a banner in a hurry? Look no further than JAHPHIX DESIGNS. Our high-quality banners can be delivered to you in 24 hours or less. Tel: (284) 340-1995 or email us at mail@jahphix.com ||
Connect with us

International

Premier Wheatley Denounces Governor’s Request for Additional Powers as a Colonial Act

Published

on

Premier Natalio Wheatley has vehemently criticised outgoing Governor John J. Rankin’s appeal for additional constitutional powers, branding it a “colonial act” that threatens the democratic rights of the Virgin Islands’ citizens.

Premier Wheatley announced on January 5 his intention to write to United Kingdom (UK) Minister David Rutley, urging him not to support Governor John Rankin’s request, emphasising the potential negative consequences of such a move.

The Premier further stressed that “subjects such as immigration and crown lands fall under the elected arm of Government, and there is no justification for powers being transferred or given to the Governor to undermine the democratic will and democratic rights of the people of the Virgin Islands.”

In his final Quarterly Report released yesterday before his departure from the territory, Governor Rankin said the government has had ample time – twenty-one months – to initiate real reform but has only managed a total of 25 of 48 recorded with only five months left before the deadline expires.

“The governor should not be seeking additional powers to bypass democracy and the people of the Virgin Islands,” Premier Wheatley strongly asserted, terming it a potential “colonial act.” He stressed that the democratic will of the people, as expressed in the April 2024 elections, should not be undermined.

He emphasised the importance of constructive engagement between the UK and the Virgin Islands, highlighting the potential damage to the recently agreed Political Declaration.

Granting the governor additional powers, Premier Wheatley argued, would contradict the Political Declaration and damage the relationship between the Virgin Islands and the UK, setting back democracy in the territory. He called for unity among Virgin Islanders to protect democracy and human rights.

Governor Rankin expressed concerns over the government’s progress in implementing the Commission of Inquiry (COI) recommendations, warning of potential constitutional suspension and requesting additional powers.

The report noted that “at the beginning of April 2023, the then UK Minister for the Overseas Territories, Lord Goldsmith, wrote to me and asked me to agree deadlines with the BVI Government to ensure that the necessary reforms have taken root no later than May 2024.”

“This ‘should allow for the Order in Council to be lifted then.’ It looks unlikely that this will be achieved and hence unlikely that the Order in Council can be lifted at that point,” the report added.

The governor stressed that “despite the best efforts of many public servants to take recommendations forward, developing plans and policy, we have not seen the promised changes delivered.”

According to the Governor, it remains “an option to consider an interim administration whereby the Governor takes over the responsibilities of Ministers in line with the Order in Council. However, this is not my recommendation at this stage.”

Instead, he has recommended that “an extension to the COI implementation process will be necessary for the Government to prove their commitment to reform and get the work done. An extension to the end of November 2024 should enable the recommendations to be fully considered and for legislation to be brought into force.”

Additionally, he explained that Lord Goldsmith, in an April 2023 letter, “asked me to consider if ‘resources, additional powers or technical expertise’ were necessary to accelerate the Government’s reform programme. In addition to exercising the powers which I have under the Virgin Islands Constitution, I have reached the conclusion that I must request additional powers to help ensure the Framework Agreement proposed by the BVI Government is delivered. Experience has shown that providing more time alone will not be sufficient to deliver reform and that there may be a need for the Governor to step in further.”

In response, Premier Wheatley highlighted genuine strides in strengthening internal processes, specifically in areas like procurement. The Premier encouraged the public to review the progress presentation made by the Premier’s Office, available online.

Acknowledging the challenges faced, Premier Wheatley explained that adjustments to deadlines were necessary to ensure the completion of reforms. He pointed out the simultaneous efforts to balance reforms with the delivery of public services, hurricane recovery, and the pause in work due to the House of Assembly’s dissolution for the elections.

The Premier underlined that some of the ongoing reforms fall under the responsibility of the Governor, who faces challenges in balancing reform implementation and overseeing constitutional responsibilities in areas like security.

Premier Wheatley drew a parallel with the UK’s Brexit, emphasising that large-scale reform exercises cannot be completed in a short span, and the BVI government had done well considering the circumstances. He expressed disappointment in the Governor’s request for additional powers, stating, “It appears he wishes to act in areas of constitutional responsibility devolved to the elected arm of government.”

Former Governor Augustus Jaspert initiated a Commission of Inquiry in January 2021 to investigate potential instances of corruption, abuse of office, or significant dishonesty within the public sector in recent years, aiming to identify the circumstances that facilitated such occurrences.

The Inquiry Commissioner Sir Gary Hickinbottom submitted a comprehensive 900-page report to Rankin on April 4, 2022 detailing findings of corruption across various government levels.

The report outlined 45 specific recommendations, including four overarching suggestions – the partial suspension of the constitution, to overhaul the BVI’s governmental and governance structures.

Amidst the looming possibility of government suspension and upheaval triggered by the arrest of Premier Andrew Fahie in April 2022 in the United States on allegations involving drugs and money laundering, an interim government emerged, led by the recently appointed Premier Natalio Wheatley. Wheatley, formerly the deputy premier during the review, spearheaded efforts to avert a constitutional suspension.

With the partial implementation of recommendations, the 2023 elections saw all political parties pledging to uphold the COI recommendations upon taking office. Premier Wheatley secured reelection in April 2023.

Rankin, who will be retiring from diplomatic service this month, shared that he continues “ to hold the best interests of the BVI in mind and I believe that these measures are necessary in ensuring that the BVI prospers in the future, with the strong foundations of a modern democracy.”

His successor will be Daniel Pruce.

Health

Global HIV Crisis Looms: U.S. Aid Freeze Could Trigger Millions of Deaths

Published

on

By

UNAIDS Executive Director Winnie Byanyima warns that the recent U.S. decision to halt foreign aid could lead to a sixfold increase in new HIV infections by 2029, potentially resulting in millions of deaths and the emergence of more resistant strains of the virus.

The U.S. administration’s 90-day suspension of foreign assistance, initiated by President Donald Trump as part of an “America First” policy, has disrupted numerous global health initiatives. This pause affects programs funded by the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), a cornerstone in the global fight against HIV/AIDS.

Byanyima stressed the gravity of the situation, stating that without U.S. support, projections indicate a significant surge in HIV cases and related fatalities. She urged the U.S. government to reconsider its stance, highlighting the potential global health crisis that could ensue.

The aid freeze has already led to the closure of several organisations reliant on PEPFAR funding, particularly in Africa. The United Nations AIDS program reported that many such entities have ceased operations due to the funding halt and a lack of clarity regarding exemptions.

In response to the suspension, advocacy groups have taken legal action against the administration. Public Citizen, a liberal-leaning organization, filed a lawsuit challenging the legality of the aid freeze, arguing that it endangers lives worldwide. The lawsuit represents organisations severely impacted by the funding halt, including those providing healthcare and humanitarian assistance.

The U.S. State Department, led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, has defended the pause, asserting that it is necessary to review foreign aid spending in alignment with the administration’s policies. However, critics warn that this move could damage the U.S.’s reliability as a global partner and potentially push aid-receiving countries towards rivals like China.

The situation remains fluid, with global health experts and humanitarian organisations closely monitoring the developments. The potential resurgence of HIV/AIDS underscores the critical importance of sustained international support and the far-reaching consequences of policy decisions on global health initiatives.

Continue Reading

International

Cuba Joins BRICS: A Power Shift That Could Reshape Global Alliances

Published

on

By

Cuba has taken a bold step onto the global stage by joining BRICS as a partner country, a move that could shift economic and political dynamics in Latin America and beyond. This status, granted following the 16th BRICS Summit in Kazan, Russia, in October 2024, allows Cuba to engage with the group’s initiatives and benefit from its economic influence without holding full membership. The decision underscores BRICS’ expanding reach as it seeks to counterbalance Western financial institutions and foster stronger ties among developing nations.

Cuba was among 13 nations invited to become BRICS partner countries, signalling the bloc’s continued efforts to reshape global economic structures. While not yet a full member, Cuba’s closer alignment with BRICS could bring significant financial relief by opening avenues for investment and trade. The group’s economic powerhouses—China, India, Brazil, Russia, and South Africa—could provide much-needed capital to revitalise Cuba’s struggling economy, potentially helping the island navigate long-standing US sanctions.

One of the most immediate benefits for Cuba would be increased trade opportunities. With major BRICS economies looking to expand their influence, Cuba stands to gain from enhanced cooperation in key sectors such as energy, technology, and agriculture. China and Russia, already close allies of Havana, are expected to deepen their economic engagement, potentially reducing Cuba’s dependence on traditional trading partners. Additionally, BRICS’ efforts to develop alternative financial systems independent of the US dollar could provide Cuba with new mechanisms to bypass US-imposed restrictions.

For BRICS, Cuba’s inclusion strengthens its foothold in Latin America. With Brazil already a member, bringing Cuba into the fold reinforces the bloc’s presence in the region and challenges the influence of Western institutions such as the International Monetary Fund and World Bank. Cuba’s longstanding role in promoting South-South cooperation aligns with BRICS’ mission to offer developing nations an alternative to Western-led economic structures.

However, Cuba’s partnership with BRICS is not without risks. Increased economic ties with the bloc could escalate tensions with the United States, which has maintained a decades-long embargo against Cuba. Washington may view this development as a strategic challenge, potentially leading to stricter sanctions or diplomatic countermeasures. Such actions could complicate Cuba’s economic recovery, particularly if the anticipated benefits of BRICS integration take time to materialise.

Domestically, BRICS engagement could push Cuba towards economic reforms. While Havana is unlikely to abandon its socialist model, the need to attract foreign investment may prompt shifts towards market-friendly policies, similar to those adopted by China and Vietnam. BRICS-backed projects could modernise Cuba’s infrastructure, boost its tourism industry, and unlock the potential of its key mineral exports, including nickel and cobalt. The country also possesses offshore oil reserves, though exploration has so far been limited.

Despite the opportunities, challenges remain. Unlike resource-rich nations such as Saudi Arabia or the UAE, which were among those invited to join BRICS as full members, Cuba’s economic contributions to the bloc may be limited. The island continues to grapple with inflation, supply shortages, and structural inefficiencies, raising questions about how effectively it can integrate into BRICS initiatives.

Ultimately, Cuba’s engagement with BRICS represents a strategic gamble—one that could provide economic relief and bolster the bloc’s influence in Latin America but also provoke resistance from the US and its allies. Success will depend on Cuba’s ability to leverage its new partnerships while navigating the geopolitical complexities that come with them.

Continue Reading

International

CDC Investigates Outbreak on Royal Caribbean’s Radiance of the Seas

Published

on

By

More than 90 passengers and crew members aboard Royal Caribbean International’s Radiance of the Seas reported cases of gastrointestinal illness during a weeklong cruise that departed from Tampa, Florida, on February 1, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The outbreak resulted in symptoms including vomiting and diarrhea. The ship, which carried 2,164 passengers and 910 crew members, returned to port on Saturday after visiting Cozumel, Roatan Islands, Belize City, and Costa Maya, according to CruiseMapper. The CDC reported that 89 passengers and two crew members fell ill during the voyage.

The CDC’s Vessel Sanitation Program was notified of the outbreak on Tuesday, midway through the cruise. The cause of the illness has not been determined. Royal Caribbean has not yet issued a public statement regarding the incident.

Affected individuals were instructed to isolate, and crew members collected stool samples for testing. In response to the outbreak, the ship’s crew increased cleaning and disinfection measures to prevent further spread of the illness.

Janet Kruse, a 57-year-old passenger from the Chicago area, traveled with a dance group called Dance with Janet. She stated that approximately 10% of her group of 120 people, aged 50 to 80, experienced symptoms. Kruse said that the first reported illness within her group occurred on Sunday, within 24 hours of boarding, followed by another case later that evening.

A shipwide announcement on Sunday afternoon indicated that an unusually high number of passengers had reported feeling unwell. As a result, the crew implemented additional sanitation measures to mitigate further spread.

The CDC continues to monitor the situation as samples are analyzed to determine the source of the outbreak.

ADVERTISEMENT:

 

Continue Reading

Trending