Central to the defence’s argument is the nature of the evidence derived from alleged WhatsApp communications between Erickson and Almestica. The Crown’s reliance on forensic extraction reports and voice analysis to link Erickson to incriminating messages on Almestica’s recovered mobile phone has been challenged as inadmissible hearsay. According to the defence, this evidence cannot stand under the scrutiny of established legal principles.

The defence contends that a close examination of the evidence in the committal bundle reveals that the purported telephone evidence is hearsay upon hearsay. They argue that the forensic extraction report, which purportedly shows WhatsApp messages linked to Erickson, is a statement made outside of court and is thus inadmissible. Additionally, the defence points out that the statement by Ms. Kim Wharton, who testified to the monikers associated with Erickson, further represents inadmissible hearsay. Wharton’s testimony relies on previous assertions not made while giving oral evidence in court, violating the rule against hearsay as established in R v Sharp [1988] and R v Kearley [1992].

The defence also references the Privy Council decision in Delroy Hopson v R [1992], which underscores that statements made outside the presence of the accused are inadmissible. In this case, any attributed designations linking Erickson to Almestica via WhatsApp messages were made in Erickson’s absence, further breaching the hearsay rule.

The issue extends to other pieces of evidence in the committal bundle, such as the designation of “WestBank” and “BandSpatron” as monikers associated with Erickson. The defence argues that these attributions are based on inadmissible voice analysis and previous statements that Wharton could not testify to in court. The defence cites the Williams v Bedwellty Justices [1996] case, which emphasises that committal proceedings must be based on admissible evidence. Any committal based on inadmissible hearsay evidence is liable to be quashed by way of judicial review and the remedy of certiorari.

Furthermore, the defence points to the principle established in R v Gunewardene [1951] and R v Dennis Lobban [1995], stating that the extrajudicial statements of a co-accused are not admissible as evidence against the defendant. In the current case, any statements made by Almestica outside of court cannot be used to implicate Erickson. The defence highlights that Ms. Wharton’s statement and the forensic extraction report are both examples of such extrajudicial statements, making them inadmissible.

The defence also critiques the methodology and credibility of the forensic extraction and voice analysis. They argue that these techniques are not only subject to significant error but also that their results were presented without the proper foundational evidence or expert testimony to verify their accuracy. This further undermines the reliability and admissibility of the evidence against Erickson.

In their argument, the defence submits that there is no admissible evidence to support the committal of Erickson for trial in the High Court. The statements and forensic reports relied upon by the Crown are riddled with inadmissible hearsay and fail to establish a prima facie case. The defence urges that, in the absence of such evidence, the charges against Erickson should be dismissed.

On February 27, 2023, Erickson was extradited to the United States Virgin Islands after unsuccessful appeals in the local Court of Appeal and in the United Kingdom Privy Council. He was charged with conspiracy to launder monetary funds from outside the United States and unlawfully transporting the funds into the United States. After six months in federal custody, prosecutors dismissed the case against him. Despite this, Erickson faced renewed legal challenges when, on 20 September, 2023, he was arrested in Road Town by local authorities as he stepped off the ferry from the United States Virgin Islands.

Nyron Erickson being whisked out by US Feds under heavy security on February 27, 2023.

The post Nyron Erickson Challenges Committal to Trial in High Court appeared first on Jahphix Television - BVI's #1 NEWS SOURCE.

The operation, which took place shortly after 11 p.m. on May 30, led to the discovery of multiple packages suspected to contain the illicit drug.

The three men aboard the vessel, identified as Julio Cabrera Martinez, 40, Tomas Balbuena Acosta, 55, and Remigio De Los Santos, 62, have been formally charged with Possession of a Controlled Drug and Possession of a Controlled Drug with Intent to Supply.

Commissioner Collins of the RVIPF remarked on the significant seizure, stating, “This significant bust underscores the RVIPF’s ongoing commitment to disrupting drug trafficking operations in the Virgin Islands.”

The suspects remain in custody awaiting their appearance at the Magistrate’s Court.

The post Fishermen Charged in $34 Million Drug Bust appeared first on Jahphix Television - BVI's #1 NEWS SOURCE.

Seantroy Hanley, 36, and Jahkeema Charles, 32, both residents of Fat Hog’s Bay, face multiple charges including possession of firearms without a license, unlawful possession of explosives, and possession of controlled substances with intent to supply.

Meanwhile, Quentin Noel, 19, from Purcell Estate, has been charged with possession of a controlled substance.

While Charles has been granted bail in the amount of $40,000 and is scheduled to appear at the Magistrate’s Court on April 18, Hanley and Noel remain in custody awaiting their respective hearings.

During the search, conducted after 5 pm in the vicinity of the basketball court in Purcell Estate, officers uncovered two firearms, multiple rounds of ammunition, a significant quantity of marijuana, and crack cocaine.

The discovery has prompted urgent calls from the RVIPF for anyone with information regarding illegal firearms to come forward and report anonymously to the Crime Stoppers line at 800-8477 (TIPS) or overseas callers at 1-284-800-8477. Additionally, individuals can contact the RVIPF Intelligence Unit at 368-9339 with pertinent information.

The post Three Charged After Firearms, Ammunition and Drugs Seized in Purcell Estate appeared first on Jahphix Television - BVI's #1 NEWS SOURCE.

The saga began on February 8th when a Miami jury found Fahie guilty on charges of conspiring to import cocaine into the United States from the British Virgin Islands, alongside three related counts of money laundering and racketeering. However, moments after the verdict, two jurors reached out to express apparent misgivings, sparking an uncommon post-trial dispute.

Judge Williams, presiding over the case, finds herself in uncharted legal territory, as both federal prosecutors and defense attorneys present conflicting views on how to address the jurors’ concerns. While prosecutors argue against revisiting the verdicts, citing a lack of evidence of misconduct or coercion, defense attorneys advocate for polling the jurors again to ensure a just resolution.

Despite the complexity of the situation, Judge Williams remains resolute in her pursuit of a fair outcome, urging both sides to collaborate in finding a viable solution. However, she warns against any contact with the jurors involved, highlighting a prior interaction between one juror and a defense attorney as cause for concern.

As the legal wrangling continues, Fahie, the ex-premier of the British Virgin Islands, awaits his fate, facing the possibility of a lengthy prison sentence.

His sentencing is scheduled for April 29th, leaving ample time for the court to navigate the intricate maze of legal challenges surrounding his conviction.

The case against Fahie hinges on allegations of corruption and collusion with drug cartels, with prosecutors painting a damning picture of his involvement in a cocaine smuggling scheme. With the stakes high and the legal landscape uncertain, the fate of the former premier hangs in the balance as the courtroom drama unfolds.

The post Federal Judge Grapples with Verdict Doubts in BVI Premier’s Cocaine Smuggling Case appeared first on Jahphix Television - BVI's #1 NEWS SOURCE.

After a trial spanning seven days, a diverse jury rendered a guilty verdict against the former politician who also faces potential fines amounting to US$10 million. The jurors deliberated for a mere four hours before arriving at their decision. Fahie, who was previously out on bail, was handcuffed and taken into custody.

His journey from the corridors of power to a courtroom in Miami has been nothing short of extraordinary. Arrested on April 28, 2022 by agents of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) at Miami-Opa Locka Executive Airport, Fahie made international headlines, shocking many supporters in his homeland.

Fahie, whose political career once seemed destined for greater heights, the verdict represents a stunning reversal of fortune.

However, as the trial progressed and evidence was presented, the territory closely followed the prosecution’s case which included extensive incriminating conversations recorded by undercover DEA agents, phone records, and testimony from the prosecution’s key witness, Oleanvine Pickering Maynard, who secured a reduced sentence through a negotiated deal.

Maynard and her son, Kadeem Stephan Maynard, found themselves apprehended in the drug sting. The male counterpart also entered into an agreement with federal authorities, resulting in a five-year sentence.

A former mathematics teacher turned lawmaker, he ascended to prominence as the representative for District One in 1999, a position he held steadfastly for 23 years. Throughout his tenure, he wielded significant influence, serving in various ministerial capacities and ultimately assuming leadership of the Virgin Islands Party (VIP).

Fahie led the VIP to a return to power in the 2019 general election, upending the long-standing dominance of the National Democratic Party. His ascent to power was met with both acclaim and scrutiny, reflecting the complex dynamics of Caribbean politics.

Fahie’s once unassailable reputation began to crumble. In November 2022, facing mounting legal pressure and public scrutiny, he resigned from his position as chairman of the VIP and withdrew from the political arena altogether.

Fahie’s sentencing Is scheduled for April 29.

The post BVI Former Premier Andrew A. Fahie Found Guilty, Sentencing Set For April appeared first on Jahphix Television - BVI's #1 NEWS SOURCE.

Oleanvine Maynard former managing director of the BVI Ports Authority, took the stand on Tuesday, February 6, in Miami, testifying against former British Virgin Islands Premier Andrew Fahie who faces drug-trafficking conspiracy charges.

Maynard, having pleaded guilty to conspiring with Fahie to import cocaine into the United States, agreed to testify against him in exchange for a potentially lighter sentence.

Her testimony, which stretched over six hours on Tuesday and resumed on Wednesday morning, offered a glimpse into a world of clandestine meetings and coded conversations. Prosecutors played secret recordings as Maynard detailed interactions with Fahie, her son Kadeem Maynard, and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) operatives, shedding light on alleged drug trafficking operations.

“On the recording,  Maynard was heard explaining to DEA confidential source who used the named “Roberto Quintero” what she hoped to gain from their arrangement. “There are things I want to accomplish. One is to pay off my house in Tortola. And when I retire I want to go to Miami. And in both areas, I want to be rent-free,” she said. Quintero then asked her to open her bag and he gave her $10,000, Ms. Maynard said. “It’s just $10,000: a little present for you,” he was heard to say on the tape. Maynard replied, “Thank you.”

As the prosecution’s fifth and final witness, Maynard’s testimony served to tie together pieces of evidence presented by prior witnesses, including DEA agents and digital forensic analysts. Her guilty plea in June 2023 to conspiracy charges marked a turning point in the trial, offering prosecutors a crucial insider perspective on the alleged conspiracy.

During her testimony, Maynard revealed how she first became entangled in the web of drug trafficking, describing meetings with associates and a DEA confidential source named “Roberto Quintero.” She detailed negotiations with Fahie, including discussions of profit-sharing agreements and a substantial cash “gift” exchanged between Fahie and Quintero.

As Maynard’s testimony continued, the courtroom remained transfixed by the unfolding drama, with Fahie continuing to deny any wrongdoing. Yet, her revelations painted a vivid picture of an alleged conspiracy spanning multiple jurisdictions.

Fahie was arrested on April 28, 2022 by agents of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) at Miami-Opa Locka Executive Airport, Fahie made international headlines, shocking many supporters in his homeland.

Maynard and her son, Kadeem Stephan Maynard, found themselves apprehended in the drug sting. Kadeem also entered into an agreement with federal authorities, resulting in a five-year sentence.

The post Former BVI Ports Authority Director Oleanvine Maynard Takes Stand Against Ex-Premier Andrew Fahie appeared first on Jahphix Television - BVI's #1 NEWS SOURCE.

The post Former BVI Premier Andrew Fahie Drug Trial Starts appeared first on Jahphix Television - BVI's #1 NEWS SOURCE.