NEWS
  • Ministry of Education Addresses Allegations of Student-Teacher Incident at Elmore Stoutt High School. ||. Virgin Islands Premier Concludes Key Talks in London, Sets Stage for Stronger UK Partnership || Thirteen Restaurants to Serve Up Lobster Delights at Anegada Lobster Festival 2024 || `Stay in School’ Message Echoed at Willock’s D3 Back to School 2024 || School Closure on Anegada as Power Outage Disrupts Island || Team BVI to Compete in WAAm Caribbean Development Championship 2024 || HLSCC Expands Global Educational Pathway with CMI Level 3 Diploma || BVI Secures First Victory in 45th Chess Olympiad || BVI Elected Vice Chair of UN Caribbean Development Committee || French Navy Ship Makes Diplomatic Visit to Virgin Islands || Atlantic Storm Watch: Virgin Islands Monitors Three Potential Threats  ||  Major Road Rehabilitation Projects Underway || Education Minister Calls for a Bold New Chapter in Virgin Islands Education || Education Minister to Attend OECS Council Meetings in St. Kitts || ADVERTISEMENT: Need a banner in a hurry? Look no further than JAHPHIX DESIGNS. Our high-quality banners can be delivered to you in 24 hours or less. Tel: (284) 340-1995 or email us at mail@jahphix.com ||
Connect with us

Politics

Some findings of Assistance Grants audit are “deeply concerning”

Published

on

BVI Governor John Rankin delivering remarks at press conference

(STATEMENT) — The audit on Assistance Grants has now been tabled and discussed in the House of Assembly, and is now available to the public with appropriate redactions. The audit was conducted in response to Commission of Inquiry Recommendation B12, and covered Assistance Grants issued between January 2019 and May 2022.

A number of the findings in the report are deeply concerning. The funds were for the most part not governed by any financial rules or eligibility criteria and were hence not consistently distributed on the basis of need. All of the programmes were absent of documented objectives and the audit highlights that individuals “within the orbit of the political arena may have received preferential treatment in the awarding of assistance”.

Over the last three years, the Government awarded a total of $23m in Assistance Grants across three ministries and the House of Assembly. The Premier’s Office accounted for 47% of the total awards given from these programmes, while the thirteen members of the House of Assembly awarded 39%.

The audit concludes that these Assistance Grants Programmes lacked “controls that would promote equity, transparency and accountabilities” and that the programmes were allowed to “operate unabated at the whims and pleasure of elected officials”. “The operations of these programmes, for the most part, did not serve to resolve any socio-economic deficiencies” and were “largely utilized to satisfy individual wants and desires”.

The classes of persons who applied and received assistance from these programmes included Permanent Secretaries and other senior public officers, attorneys and entrepreneurs. Some instances were found where single applicants received in excess of $50,000 in a single payment. In one instance a senior public officer and their immediate family members received grants totally $217,900 over the period. The audit concludes that there is evidence of “abuse of discretionary authority by Members in awarding grants” as well as “abuse by applicants who have utilized the deficiencies to benefit themselves significantly”.

As the programmes lacked cross ministry communication and collaboration, some applicants made and received assistance from multiple programmes for the same purpose. In some cases, applicants received more funds than originally requested. The 149 page appendix to the audit report sets out the amounts received by each individual beneficiary, applicant or vendor.

The auditor found that the programmes operated by the Ministry of Communications and Works were specifically targeted towards things such as home repairs, and the programme operated by the Ministry of Education appeared to be intending to serve academic and cultural purposes. The programmes operated by the House of Assembly and Premier’s Office had no such limitations or focus and were utilised for an expansive array of purposes based on the Members’ or Ministers’ determination.

Let me assure the public that this audit in no way criticises those who were deserving of assistance and legitimately asked for support. Rather the audit exposes the lack of controls and criteria which appear to have allowed the system to be abused.

I will be forwarding the audit report on Assistance Grants to the Attorney General’s Office for the Attorney General to assess whether the Government should pursue recovery in any instances. I will also ask the Director of Public Prosecutions and the Police to assess if any offences were committed.

The wholesale review of the system of benefits and grants conducted in partnership with UNICEF has now been received and I am pleased that the Department of Social Security and Health are taking these recommendations forwards.

It should be noted that the payments considered for this Assistance Grants audit are separate from the $16m issued in Covid-19 Assistance Grants and are separate from funding for local district infrastructure projects. I am expecting to receive an audit on Covid-19 Assistance Grants by the end of March and I will cause it to be laid in the House of Assembly within three months, in accordance with the Audit Act 2003.

I welcome the commitment to reform which was expressed in the House of Assembly. It is vital that the necessary reforms are taken forward both before and after the forthcoming General Election, ensuring that public money is properly used to have a positive impact on people who find themselves in need.

Local News

Premier Slams Opposition Over “Misinformation” in No-Confidence Motion Debacle

Published

on

By

Premier of the Virgin Islands, the Honourable Natalio D. Wheatley, has condemned the Opposition’s handling of a No Confidence Motion, accusing them of “bungling” the process by failing to comply with the Standing Orders of the House of Assembly.

In his remarks to the public, Premier Wheatley took aim at the Opposition for spreading what he called “misinformation” and for directing “vicious comments” towards the Honourable Speaker of the House of Assembly, whom he insists was not at fault in this matter. “It is unfortunate that some persons have chosen to be selective with the facts,” Wheatley stated, “taking Virgin Islands politics to a dark place.”

The Premier reiterated that while every member of His Majesty’s Loyal Opposition has the constitutional right to challenge the Government, “persons cannot on one hand profess to be the vanguards of law and order, and truth and righteousness, and then flout the rules and regulations just because it is convenient to their agenda.”

He further called on the Opposition to apologise to the Speaker for “pre-empting her ruling, walking out of the House while she was delivering her ruling, and casting aspersions against her integrity.” According to Wheatley, “a higher standard of conduct is expected from those who aspire to lead the country.”

The controversy arose from the Opposition’s failure to adhere to the procedures for filing their Motion of No Confidence. The Premier emphasised that the Standing Orders, amended in 2016, clearly distinguish between Government Business and Private Members’ Business. He argued that the Opposition’s motion was categorised under Private Members’ Business, and that the Speaker’s ruling was correct. “A simple reading of the Standing Orders will show that the Opposition’s Motion was clearly Private Members’ Business, and the Honourable Speaker was correct in her ruling,” Wheatley asserted.

Premier Wheatley went on to accuse the Opposition of prioritising political gamesmanship over the completion of critical reforms, claiming that the timing of their Motion was intended to undermine the Government’s efforts to petition the UK for the lifting of the Order in Council. “The Opposition prioritises ‘brownie points’ over the completion of the recommendations and the removal of the threat to suspend our Constitution,” he charged.

As he concluded his statement, the Premier reaffirmed his administration’s commitment to serving the public, highlighting ongoing efforts to repair roads, address infrastructure challenges, and finalise the steps necessary to meet the Commission of Inquiry’s recommendations. “My Administration remains united and firmly committed to our responsibility,” Wheatley stated. “There is a lot that needs to be done instead of staging walkouts and press conferences.”

He closed by expressing his readiness to engage in debate when the Motion is properly brought forward, adding, “I look forward to responding to the Motion when it does come up for debate, assuming the Opposition complies with the Standing Orders of the House.”

Continue Reading

Local News

BVI Premier Seeks Removal of Opposition No-Confidence Motion Over Procedural Errors

Published

on

By

British Virgin Islands Premier Natalio Wheatley has requested the removal of an opposition no-confidence motion from the House of Assembly’s Order Paper, citing procedural inaccuracies in its submission.

The motion, which seeks the dissolution of the current Fifth House of Assembly and calls for new elections, has created a tense atmosphere in the proceedings on September 3.

The Leader of the Opposition, Ronnie Skelton, is barred from introducing the motion, which criticises Premier Wheatley and Finance Minister for a series of alleged failures.

The opposition accuses the Virgin Islands Party (VIP)-led government, in power since April 2023, of worsening the economic outlook, diminishing quality of life, and eroding public trust.

Key points in the motion include Wheatley’s recent admission of a $20 million underestimation in public officials’ salaries, which could strain public resources.

It also criticises the Premier for failing to deliver an economic plan or a tourism strategy, and for mismanaging government assets like the Prospect Reef Hotel and the British Virgin Islands Music Festival 2024.

Other grievances include excessive international travel spending, underfunding of crucial sectors such as education and agriculture, and concerns about the Premier’s handling of infrastructure and public safety.

Further complaints involve the Premier’s unilateral decisions on decolonisation discussions with the UN and acceptance of the Commission of Inquiry’s recommendations, which the opposition argues have eroded public trust and accountability.

Residents are closely monitoring today’s House of Assembly proceedings, which are expected to have significant implications.

Continue Reading

Local News

Opposition Leader to Introduce No-Confidence Motion Against Virgin Islands Government

Published

on

By

The Leader of the Opposition, Hon. Ronnie Skelton, is set to introduce a no-confidence motion against the current Virgin Islands government, citing a series of alleged failures by Premier and Minister for Finance, Hon. Dr. Natalio Wheatley. The motion argues that since assuming office in April 2023, Premier Wheatley’s leadership has led to a deteriorating economic outlook, declining quality of life, and a lack of public trust in the government.

The motion highlights several key points, including Premier Wheatley’s recent admission in the House of Assembly of a $20 million underestimation in salary increases for public officials, which could place a significant strain on public resources. It also criticizes the Premier for failing to produce an economic plan for the Territory, despite repeated requests from Opposition members, and for a lack of a comprehensive tourism plan to enhance the Virgin Islands’ market share.

Further allegations include the neglect of key government assets, such as the dilapidated state of the Prospect Reef Hotel, the mismanagement of public funds on initiatives like the Virgin Islands Music Festival 2024, and excessive government spending on international travel. The motion also points to the underfunding of critical sectors such as education, small businesses, and agriculture, and raises concerns over the Premier’s handling of the Territory’s infrastructure and public safety challenges.

Additional grievances center around the Premier’s unilateral decisions without public consultation, including his dialogues with the UN on decolonization and his acceptance of the Commission of Inquiry’s recommendations. The Opposition contends that these actions have undermined public trust and accountability.

The motion concludes with a call for the dissolution of the current Fifth House of Assembly, urging a new election to allow citizens to elect a government in which they can place their confidence.

 

 

 

 

Continue Reading

Trending